Donald Trump tells his base that his immigration policy is anti-Muslim, and more than 90% of the people affected by it are Muslim. The Solicitor General tells the Court that the ban is not anti-Muslim because most Muslims in the world do not fall within it. The question is whether the President gets to have it both ways.
Search
Recent Posts
- end of blogging
- Images/Photos not appearing in some posts
- A thorough re-examination of the moral and political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes, “precursor of modern [L]iberalism” (Larry May)—Essential Reading
- Fools, Hypocrites, Zealots, and Dupes as “social character” types deaf to the voice of reason (or the reasonable)
- Cosmopolitan Arguments or Sym-Philosophy in Eunomia
- The Myth of Normal or the Pathology of Normalcy
- Notes on Happiness
- Etiquette, good manners, and social norms
- Capitalist Ethos and Imperatives Corrupt Liberal and Democratic Education
- Sherry F. Colb 1966-2022 — In Memoriam
StatCounter
« Hate Speech, Strossen, and Waldron: Matsuda to the Rescue | Main | Happy May Day! »
04/26/2018
The comments to this entry are closed.
About
- Religious Left Law brings together progressives from various faith traditions to discuss religion, law, politics, and/or culture.
Contributors
Links
- Ad Dominum
- AlterNet
- Americans United for Separation of Church and State
- Balkinization
- Buddhist Peace Fellowship
- Center for Law and Religion Forum
- Walter H. Capps Center for the Study of Ethics, Religion, and Public Life
- Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy
- Christian Century
- Corey Robin
- Daily Kos
- Dorf on Law
- dotCommonweal
- Episcopal Cafe
- Feminist Law Professors
- Hindu American Foundation
- Huffington Post
- Hullabaloo
- Immanent Frame
- Karamah: Muslim Women Lawyers for Human Rights
- Karuna
- National Catholic Reporter
- Network of Engaged Buddhists
- Nihil Obstat
- Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life
- Religion Clause
- Religion News Service
- Rewire.News
- Sojourners
- Talking Points Memo
Comments