That's the title of a great post at dotCommonweal. Check it out, here.
Search
Recent Posts
- Abortion and the Democrat's Reading of the Constitution
- Enlarging the circle of care and concern, rights and obligations...and gratitude, to the “web of life”
- Residency, Immigrant Voting, Jamie Raskin, and Ken Karst
- “artisanal miner (or mining): a term that is, facilitates, or contributes to, a “mystifying illusion”
- Toward a democratic “binational” or one state in Palestine
- Peggy Noonan and "Woke" Education
- Quigley on the need for radical or revolutionary social change lawyers
- The Congo and Coltan: Political Economy, Precious Commodity, and Politics—an introduction and brief bibliography
- One person’s discretionary labor in the surreal and foreboding age of hyper-capitalist technology in general and artificial intelligence and social media in particular
- Facts and Fiction: The lingering (and occasionally suffocating) ambivalent and equivocal legacy of the “founders”
StatCounter
« ABA President Demands that US President Join Him as a Court Apologist | Main | The Health Insurance Mandate and Justice Scalia's Social Darwinism »
04/11/2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
About
- Religious Left Law brings together progressives from various faith traditions to discuss religion, law, politics, and/or culture.
Contributors
Links
- Ad Dominum
- AlterNet
- Americans United for Separation of Church and State
- Balkinization
- Buddhist Peace Fellowship
- Center for Law and Religion Forum
- Walter H. Capps Center for the Study of Ethics, Religion, and Public Life
- Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy
- Christian Century
- Corey Robin
- Daily Kos
- Dorf on Law
- dotCommonweal
- Episcopal Cafe
- Feminist Law Professors
- Hindu American Foundation
- Huffington Post
- Hullabaloo
- Immanent Frame
- Karamah: Muslim Women Lawyers for Human Rights
- Karuna
- National Catholic Reporter
- Network of Engaged Buddhists
- Nihil Obstat
- Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life
- Religion Clause
- Religion News Service
- Rewire.News
- Sojourners
- Talking Points Memo
Sex is fun. Pleasure is good. The only time sex and other pleasures should be questioned, taxed or prohibited is when they inflict externalities on other folks.
Some of the greatest externality costs are inflicted on others by marriage and breeding, both of which shift costs to singles and breeders more than any activity I can think of.
Private sex, in whatever position with whatever person, animal or thing, only causes externalities when protection and contraception not used.
Posted by: Jimbino | 04/12/2012 at 09:55 AM
If you really want to simplify the discussion and shorten the list, the OP should be entitled, "What some priests understand about sex."
Posted by: Jimbino | 04/16/2012 at 03:57 PM